![]() The GPU was a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Founders Edition) card and latest motherboard drivers were used for fair testing comparison. Testing platform included a ASUS ROG Crosshair VI Hero motherboard coupled with G.Skill's Trident Z RGB memory that was clocked at 2666 MHz. The processor was tested against the Core i7-6900K and the Core i7-7700K processors. AMD Ryzen 7 Series Processor Lineup: AMD Ryzen CPU Model The chip comes with an unlocked multiplier, allowing users to clock this chip with ease through the AMD Ryzen Master overclocking utility or motherboard BIOS. This is a test of Stockfish, an advanced open-source C++11 chess benchmark that can scale up to 512 CPU threads. The chip features 16 MB of 元 cache and 4 MB of L2 cache. We additionally get an extra 100 MHz out of this chip with XFR (Extended Frequency Range) that allows the chip to boost beyond its rated precision boost clock speeds. As an end point consumer, I'm just happy to see actual legit competition between the major CPU and GPU communities.For the price, we get an 8 core, 16 thread processor that is clocked at 3.6 GHz base and 4.0 GHz boost clocks. ![]() Now AMD has a chip that's more powerful that that, that's still listed for about half of what that intel chip was and it's "price gouging" :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:įanboys of any brand are obnoxious. And that chip is just one step down from the wildly expensive Core. ![]() Remember the time Intel's flagship chip was like $1,400/USD? And intel fanboys cried and fawned in the glory of it's brilliance. The Ryzen 7 1800X's stock clock speeds and eight cores match up quite well, on paper, against Intel's 1,000-plus Core i7-6900K. They are both corporates, sorry I hope it won't come as a shook to you :) Trustdesa said:It also humorous how fanboys cried at Intel "robbing" "price gauging" but now that their master AMD is showing to be as anti consumer, even more so with GPU fanboys defend what they were crying about before. I mean guys if you have no economics basis and your jobs do not involve finance perhaps you should not comment :) Consumer excited by their masters charging more, imagine if Intel or Nvidia or ATI, or S3 or any tech company charged £50 more each generation, a CPU or GPU or Monitor would cost you ehmmm £50k circa if we start from 8086 onwards. It must be sad being a fanboys of a brand making silicon chip.like really sad. It also humorous how fanboys cried at Intel "robbing" "price gauging" but now that their master AMD is showing to be as anti consumer, even more so with GPU fanboys defend what they were crying about before. All three processors are full 8-core CPUs, with hyperthreading just as the top Intel i7 series offer. AMD’s new line has started with three processors, the R7 1800x, priced at 499, the R7 1700X priced at 399, and the R7 1700 priced at 329. I can't wait to see how intel counter punches here. Today the new 14nm processors hit the shelves and benchmarks have been appearing all over the place. Even AMD and Nvidia is getting interesting! A fantastic time to be a home builder. And it's been a bit since I shopped intel chips, but last I checked, Intel hasn't been bundling coolers with their chips for a while? Someone who follows intel might be able to provide me some guidance there.Īs a home building enthusiast (for the last decade or so) this is a very exciting time having legit competition between team red and team blue. For the last decade, Intels flagship processor has been half again as much as the current Ryzen5000 and so few tech sites batted an eye about it. VTXcnME said:Humorous the 'cons' that list price increases of $50. The AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 1700 are being released today and are 300+ processors that each are 8-core, 16-thread parts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |